Censorship in the Press
With the return of
the emergency regime in 1978, the threats against the freedom of the Press grew
more ominous than ever. In a case involving a newspaper the supreme court ruled
that the freedom of the Press rests on the assumption that widest possible
dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential
to the welfare of the public.
The newsprints
advisory committee of the Central Government once considered proposals to deny
newsprint to papers indulging in anti – national activities”. As also to those
found guilty by a court of law or censured by the Press Council for publishing
material which is obscene or against good taste or which advocates violence,
spreads ill- feeling between various communities or is likely to endanger the
unity and integrity and defense of the country. Such a move would kill what
ever semblance of Press freedom we have
today, for as the editors’ guild of india’s response indicates, the Powers
sought by the Government are omnibus in nature and these- called defenses are
vaguely defined’. As though the monopolistic control in newsprint were not
enough. the Government has licensed all import of printing machinery, and
prohibited any direct subscription to a foreign news agency. It has to be
channeled through the Government.
Yet another lever
of control exercised tactfully by Government is the issue of advertisements by
the directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity (DAVP)—a body the
undertakes visual publicity campaigns on behalf of various ministries
departments and autonomous bodies. Besides state Governments too have their own
publicity departments. Medium and small newspapers are beholden to these bodies
for very often their very sustenance depends on the largesse from them.
Volume 2 of the
Annual Report of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting provides
exhaustive list of the amount paid each year by the DAVP to the big, medium and
small newspapers for buying space for advertising. Below is a small news papers
for buying space for advertising. Below is a sample of the revenue earned by
some well – known dailies in 1996:
Quantum of
advertisements Issued to Some Indian Dailies by the DAVP
Publication
|
Edition
|
Space
(Col.Cm)
|
Amt.
Earned
(in Rs. Million)
|
|
1
|
The Time of
|
56,473
|
13,409,183
|
|
2
|
The Indian
Express
|
66,595
|
3,950,493
|
|
3
|
Kesari
|
Pune
|
20,025
|
588,398
|
4
|
Sakal
|
Pune
|
10,089
|
1,125,303
|
5
|
The Shillong
Times
|
Shillong
|
34,537
|
734,510,
|
6
|
Anand Bazar
Patrika
|
22,216
|
6,465,287
|
|
7
|
Thanthi
|
50,039
|
3,424,614
|
|
8
|
Malayala Manorama
|
Trivendrum
|
18,444
|
1,522,879
|
9
|
Rajasthan Patrika
|
Jaipur
|
872
|
9,639,
|
10
|
Nav Bharat
|
21,218
|
800,320
|
(Source: Compiled
from Annual Report1996 – 97,Vol. II, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting)
Moreover, the
threats of pre–censorship, of confiscation printed copies and seizure of
printing Presses, and of the cutting off of electricity to newspaper
establishments – all reminiscent of the dark days of the emergency – are not
imaginary fears. The suppression of the Asli Bharat and some other publications
that reported the Moradabad
riots, and of the Assam Press during the agitations in that state, are still
fresh in freedom –levers’ minds. The Assam
high court’s striking down of the Assam ’s
state special powers Press act, under which pre–censorship was clamped,
demonstrates how the only protection Press freedom in India can hope
to get is from the courts. Or, from a vigilant public, as the withdrawal of he
Bihar Press bill (1982) demonstrates. Far more worrying than the external
threats of censorship are the internal threats from proprietors, senior
loyalists and news editors who would rather play safe than endanger their own
interprets, both professional and material, ‘ self–censorship’ in journalism,
not so much out of concern for public welfare and interest , but rather out of
a desire to curry favour with local politicians, advertisers and other lobbyists,
has iced to a decline in the credibility of the Press. In Maharashtra ,
for instance, it is a regular practice for journalists to act as the public
relation agents of sugar barons, builders and local politicians.
See Also :
No comments:
Post a Comment