A Short
History of Indian Journalism
Process of Journalist Story Publishing |
The first newspaper
meant for publication was ‘announced’ in 1776 by William Bolts. He asked those
interested to come to his residence to read the news. This ‘newspaper’ had the
twin function of informing the British community of news from ‘home’, and of
ventilating grievances against the colonial administration.
Hicky’s Gazette
But it was not
until James Augustus Hicky dared to start his Bengal Gazette (also called
Hicky’s Gazette) in 1780 that the age of Journalism dawned in the country. England had
already had a taste of the Spectator papers of Addison and Steele, and of
lesser known periodicals as well, and learnt about the power of the periodical
essayists, to laugh to scorn the manners and mores of society, and of those in
high places.
Political and
social corruption was rife among the British sent to rule the country when
Hicky, a printer by profession, launched his Gazette ‘in order to purchase
freedom for my mind and soul’. He described the Bengal Gazette (later called
Hicky’s Gazette) as a ‘weekly political and commercial paper open to all
parties but influenced by none’. His venom was aimed at individuals like Mrs.
Warren Hastings and their private affairs. He published announcements of
marriages and engagements, and of ‘likely’ engagements.8 The Gazette
was, in essence, no better than a scandal sheet. Barely a year later, Sir
Warren Hastings denied all postal facilities to Hicky who hit back with these
ringing words:
‘Mr. Hicky considers the Liberty of the Press to be essential to the
very existence of an Englishman and a free Government. The subject should have
full liberty to declare his principles and opinions, and every act which tends
to coerce that liberty is tyrannical and injurious to the community’.
In June the
following year (1781), Hicky was arrested and thrust into jail, from where he
continued writing for the Gazette. He was stopped from ‘bringing out his weekly
only when the types used for printing were seized’.
Five newspapers
made their appearance in Bengal in six years’
time-all started by Englishmen. Some of these newspapers received Government
patronage. The Madras Courier and the Bombay Herald (which later merged with
the Bombay Courier) were then launched in the two cities. They were
subservient to the Government, and
therefore flourished. The total circulation of all these weeklies was not more
than 2,000; yet, the Government issued Press Regulations (1799) making the
publication of the name of the printer, editor and proprietor obligatory. The
regulation also ordered these to declare themselves to the secretary of the
Government ; and to submit all was established with the aid of Government grant
and in the North West Provinces, a Hindu and an Urdu periodicals started of
under the Government patronage. The Bengali Press with as many as nine
Newspaper. Material for prior examination to the same authority. Pre-censorship
was to dog the Indian journalist for many years to come.
Indian language Press
The pioneers of
Indian language journalism were the Serampore Missionaries with Samachar Darpan
and other Bengali periodicals, and Raja
Ram Mohan Roy with his Persian newspaper Miraltool Akbar. The object of Ram
Mohan Roy , the social reformer, in starting the paper was ‘to lay before the public such articles of
intelligence as may increase their experience, and tend to their social
improvement’ , and to ‘indicate to the rulers a knowledge of the real situation
of their subjects , and make the subjects acquainted with the established laws
and customs of their rules’. Roy
ceased publishing his paper later in protest against the Government’s Press
Regulations.
The Bombay Samachar
, a Gujarati newspaper, appeared in 1822. It was almost a decade before daily
vernacular papers like Mumbai Vartaman
(1830). The Jan-e-Jamshed (1831), and the Bombay Darpan (1850) began
publication. In the South, a Tamil, and a Telugu newspaper .
In 1839 had a circulation of around 200 copies each,
even as the British Press with 26 newspapers (six of them dailies) grew in
strength and power, under the liberal rule of Lord Metcalfe, and later of Lord
Auckland.
Censorship and the mutiny
The year of what
the British historians term ‘the Sepoy Mutiny’, however, brought back the
Press restriction in the form of the
Gagging Act, 1857 Lord Canning argued for them, stating that ‘there are times
in the existence of every state in which something of the liberties and rights,
which it jealously cherishes and scrupulously guards in ordinary Seacons, must
be sacrificed for the public welfare . Such is the State of India at this
moment. Such a time has come upon us. The liberty of the Press is no
exception.’
The mutiny brought
the rule of the East India Company to a close, with the Crown taking over the
colony’, with the promise of religious toleration and Press freedom. The main
topics of discussion in the English and vernacular Press before and after the
Mutiny were sati, caste, widow remarriage, polygamy, crimes, and opposition to
the teaching of English in schools and colleges. Bombay ’s Gujarati Press in particular,
excelled in the defence of the Indian way of life. In 1876 the Vernacular Press
Act was promulgated.
During the next two
decades The Times of India, the Pioneer, the Madras Mail, and The Amrit Bazar
Patrika came into existence –all except the last edited by English men and
serving the interest of English educated readers. The English Press played down
the inaugural meeting of the Indian national congress on December 28, 1885 in Bombay , but it was
reported at length by the vernacular papers such as Kesari (founded by Lokmanya
Tilak). The Amrit Bazar Patrika and Kesari soon gained a reputation for
opposing Government attempts to suppress nationalist aspirations. The Amrit
Bazaar Patrika, for instance, denounced the deposition of the maharaja of
Kashmir, and Kesari was foremost in attacking the Age of consent Bill of
1891 , which sought to prohibit the consummation of marriage before a
bride completed the age of 12.The Kesari’s stand was enedorsed by the Amrit
Bazar Patrika and Bangabasi of Calcutta on the ground that the Government had
no right to interfere with traditional Hindu customs. Tilak charged the
Government with disrespect for the liberty and privacy of the Indian people and
with negligence in providing relief during the Countrywide famine in 1896 – 97,
which resulted in the death of over a million people .
Such savage anti-
Government sentiments could not be allowed free play and so Lord Elgin added
sections to the Indian Penal Code to enable the Government to deal with
promotion of ‘disaffection’ against the Crown; or of enmity and hatred between
different classes. Also prohibited was the circulation of any reports with
intent to cause mutiny among British troops, intent to cause such fear or alarm
among the public as to cause any person to commit an offence against the state,
or intent to incite any class or to commit an offence against the state, or
intent to incite any class or community. The penalties for offences ranged from
life imprisonment to short imprisonment
or fines.
The man who became
the most note worthy victim of these new laws was none other than Bal Gangadhar
Tilak, editor of Kesari and its English companion, Mahratha. He was arrested, convicted and
jailed for six years, but Kesari continued to build up its reputation and
influence as a national daily, as India woke to the 20th
century. Other campaigns of Press freedom who were prosecuted at about the same
time wear Aurobindo Ghose of Bande Mataram, B.B. Upadhayaya of Sandhaya of
Sandhay and B.N. Dutt of Jugantar.
In 1910, the Indian
Press Act clamped further controls on newspaper in the wake of the partition of
Bengal and violent attacks by terrorists in
Ahmedabad, Ambala and elsewhere. The Act required owners of printing Presses to
deposit securities of Rs.500 to Rs. 2,000, which were forfeited if ‘
objectionable matters’ were printed. The threats of seizure of the printing
Press, and confiscation of copies sent by post were also included in the Act.
The vernacular Press suffered rigorous suppression during this period
(1910-1914). The Government banned 50 works in English and 272 in the
vernacular, which included 114 in Marathi, 52 in Urdu and 51 in Bengali.”
World War I
introduced still more severe Press laws but there was no let-up in nationalist
agitations. Annie Besant’s New India became the mouthpiece of Home Rule
advocates , ably supported by the Bombay Chronicle (edited by Benjamin
Horniman), Maratha (edited by N.C.Kelkar) and other publications. The
Government reacted swiftly by exiling Annie Besant , deporting Horniman and
imposing new securities on offending
publications. The Rowlatt Act of 1919 infuriated Indian opinion, which now came
under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi. His Non Co-operation Movement took the
Press by storm. Gandhi was to remain
front-page news for years to come. His arrests and imprisonments were covered
with relish by the English and the
vernacular Press , whose readership now rose dramatically. The Swaraj Party led
by C.R Das, Vallabhbahi Patel and motilal Nehru, launched its own publications
–the Banglar Katha in Calcutta .
The Swadesh Mitram in the South, and Hindustan
Times, Pratap and Basumati in the North.
The Indian
Press Ordinance (1930), like the Press
Act of 1910, and five other Ordinances gave added to the Government in dealing
with acts of terrorism, and inflammatory literature. The Swadeshi Movement, covered prominently by the Press,
as in The Hindu (Madras )
led to the imprisonment of leaders like Gandhi and Nehru, and of editors like
S.A. Brelvi of Bombay Chronicle and Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi of Pratap. The
Indian Press (Emergency Powers) Act of 1931 raised deposit securities and
fines, and gave Magistrates the power to issue summary actions. Several other
Acts were made law during the thirties, forcing the closure of many Presses and
publications.
Meanwhile, The Free
Press of India, which began as a news agency, started The Indian Express and
Dhenamani in Madras , The Free Press Journal in Bombay , and Gujarati and
Marathi Journals. The News agency
collapsed after it forfeited Rs. 20,000 security under the Indian Press
(Emergency Powers) Act, but its publications continued under different owners,
and The Free Press editors Stated a new agency called the United Press of India
(U.P.I.)
Then came the Quit
India Movement , and World War II, and the Press in India , including the English
language Press and that in the Indian Native States played a commendable role
in reporting the struggle for freedom
fairly. It opposed communal riots and the partition of the Country, and when partition did take place in
the glorious year of independence, lamented it. Indeed, it could be said that
that the Press played no small part in India ’s victory to freedom of
speech and expression upheld the freedom of the Press. While the obnoxious Press Acts were repealed or amended, the
Official Secrets Act and sections of the Indian code dealing with disaffection,
communal hatreat and incitement of armed forces to disloyalty, were retained.
The Nehru
Government Passed in October 1951 the Press (Objectionable Matters) Act which
was reminiscent of earlier Press laws enacted by the colonial rulers. The
‘objectionable matters’ were quite comprehenaive. So fierce was the opposition
to it that in 1956,it was allowed to lapse, and the First Press Commission was
formed.
The national and
regional Press covered the campaigns of the first national elections of
1951-1952 with professional skill. So were the other events of the Nehru era,
like the formation of the linguistic States, the second and third general elections. The Chinese attack , and the take-over of Goa . Unlike her father, Mrs. Indira Gandhi had never been
at ease with the Press. How much freedom can the Press have in a country like
India fighting poverty, backwardness, ignorance, disease and superstitions ?’
asked she in the first year of her regime The national dailies grew strident in
their attacks on her Government , especially
on the question of nationalization of banks, privy purses, the Congress
split , but joined forces with her during the Bangla Desh war of liberation .
The attacks reached their climax in the period prior to the emergency, with
open accusations of rampant corruption, and demands for her resignation,
followed by the Allahabad High Court’s verdict of her being guilty of corrupt
election practices.
See Also :
was helpful...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletewas helpful...
ReplyDeleteGreat Work, Thanks for the information.
ReplyDeleteAlso get latest news from:-
Latest News
Top Breaking News
Bollywood News
Sports News
Business News
Political News
National International news
Entertainment news